Saturday, June 2, 2012

The Light-Grace

Additional comments to "The Master of Wisdom and the Apprentice" III part

I´ve been translating a few points from a french page for you to acknowledge about the  mentioned messages supposedly from Sri Aurobindo.

The context of the web-page transcribes a few hundred of messages which suppose a too extent material for presenting a thoroughful study, but there can be extracted a few provvisional conclusions, which are as follow:
the channels: Jean-Luc Ayoun and Veronique Loriot seem linked to the teaching from Om ram Mikael Ivanhov.
 Sri Aurobindo:
The entity talking through the channel affirms:
He is the one 50 years ago lived on earth as Sri Aurobindo, he was John, who wrote the Apocalypses, then announcing the times of the coming of the supermental light, and, 50 years ago, inaugurating that Descent.

..."I was John, the beloved disciple, and I was whom you call Sri Aurobindo in my last incarnation. I am the one who faithful transcribed the future history which you are living now. Similarly, I´ve been the one who tryed to describe the most faithful possible I could, and independently from any religious structure, the return of the Light. I was who described its manifestations, means and principles"...

..."In my last incarnation I´ve written in poetry or prose of a number of important elements concerning experiences I lived, as well, the application of that experiences to the ordinary life, precognizing  a new way of life and new places to live in, which certain people are still following"...

..."I will be from now on the spokesman for the 24 Elders, called the "Lipikas of the Karma" or Melkizedech"...

 [ Lipika (Sanskrit) (from the verbal root lip to write)
A scribe; divine beings connected with karma. The lipika are active cosmic karmic intelligences, the highest class of architects, which lay down from manvantara to manvantara the tracks of karmic evolution to be followed by all evolving entities within the manvantara about to begin.

( The lipikas are among the very highest classes of dhyani-chohans or cosmic spirits in the universe; as entities, they may be thought of as acting from the highest planes, they connect, karmically, the planes of pure spirit with those of matter, the cosmically vast with the manifested. These recorders of and in the karmic ledger of the solar system mark the distinctive barrier between the personal ego and the impersonal self).

(The lipikas correspond to the Egyptian forty Assessors of Amenti, to the four Recording Angels of the Cabala, the Hindu four Maharajahs and chitra-gupta, the Christian seven Angels of the Presence, and to the Book of Life of Revelations. They are directly connected with karma, with the Day of Judgment, or the Day-Be-With-Us, when everything becomes one, all individuals becoming one, yet each knowing itself).

Melchizedeks:
The Melchizedeks are widely known as emergency Sons, for they engage in an amazing range of activities on the worlds of a local universe. When any extraordinary problem arises, or when something unusual is to be attempted, it is quite often a Melchizedek who accepts the assignment. The ability of the Melchizedek Sons to function in emergencies and on widely divergent levels of the universe, even on the physical level of personality manifestation, is peculiar to their order. Only the Life Carriers share to any degree this metamorphic range of personality function].

..."In my last incarnation I´ve been writing and talking about the "blue bird".(reference to Sri Aurobindo´s poem "The Blue Bird"? http://intyoga.online.fr/bluebird.htm)
Those who read it will see I mentioned there the "Wave of Life" even if at that moment the earth itself wasn´t yet Liberated"...

..."Today, things are radically different because the earth has been fecundated and expresses through you and within you the answer to the Supramental"...

.."Today, the call we have made to that Light have allowed that Supramental Light to spread and display itself as that White Vibratory Light over earth"...

..."The new structures have already been activated having permitted to display and reveal the points called "Stars", in the "Radiant Crown" of the head. Those points at the moment of their connection to the Consciousness becomes the "Entry Doors" (for the Fire) between the Radiant Crown of the head, the Radiant Crown of the Heart and the sacrum"..

( I have seen here a correspondence with the experience I mentioned with "the Invisible Being" e.g. the Fire entering the sacrum and the Radiating Crown around my head, with the points of light around the head playing on magnetic patterns (the Stars here mentioned?)

..."The Fire of the Heart in some of you is activated with independence from this circuit and the total activation of the Radiant Crown of the head, which may facilitate somehow the Surrender to the Light"...

..."This Fire corresponds to what I´ve mentioned in my previous life as  the level of the Citta, or else, the Supra-Mental".

..."The Fire of Love is Intelligence of the Light and Intelligence of the Fire"...

..."The Fire of the Heart is the Quintessence of the Unitarian Vibration, which will conduct you to your Eternity and Essence. Nothing may found place in this new space of Existence which hasn´t been actualized and established itself, in a definitive manner, in the Vibration of the Fire of the Heart"...

..."The Supramental, or Wave of Life"...

The basic concepts expressed in the messages are of a personality turning towards its soul and this soul turning toward the Spirit.
In order to do this and in answer to cosmic needs, there are some alteration of the structures in order to allow the New Light-Vibration, which correspond to a more generalized ascensional process.
Personal involvement is required, especially for the re-location of the Consciousness within the Heart. A total surrender to the action of that Light seems to be the only right attitude.
It is observed a certain process of Fusion.

It would be a too extent a purpose try to convey the whole idea and concepts and Beings involved in this process as mentioned in the web page, and it is here presented as a possible subject for anyone wishing to farther study it.

..........................
up-date:

We are not supporting the above mentioned people or ideas.
We only can guarantee the authenticity of the facts mentioned in this blog, which have no other reason but to inform you about the central vision of Savitri by direct requirement of the Master Sri Aurobindo.


Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mondi d´acqua




C´é una vibrazione in fondo all´essere,
 una paura a scomparire, a smettere di esistere,
su questo scoglio, alghe verdi e molluschi
armonizzano la fondamentale asperitá della roccia.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

add. to "The Six Visions"




I feel the inner urgency to explain you what my subtle perception suggests me:

It could only be Mother who could have the vision of the next great human connection to their Work.
 A being in connection with a farther revelation (through self achievement) of the supermental possibilities.
She had the revelatory vision of that a hundred years ago, and only a decade impeached  they both  coincide on earth. When she left, his birth was yet dawning on subtler levels of existence, where she could accede presenting us the transcendental meaning his birth would have on earth.

As soon as one reaches the original message of Dharma Sangha, one can´t avoid consider that his statements are but the continuity of the message of Sri Aurobindo and Mother.
On my opinion, the circumstance that he is now spreading his message mainly into a Buddhist context is partly to affect and revitalize it, connecting it to a more dynamic concept of the supermental reality (Maitreya Consciousness=Supermental Consciousness).
We should notice he said of himself:- I´m not a Buddhist.

As Sri Aurobindo, Dharma Sangha is not speaking of a Paradise elsewhere, but right here on earth. This is the substantial change he is bringing to Buddhism. Much as Sri Aurobindo represented a substantial change of the traditional yoga.
And they both meet at the same point.
What is of extraordinary importance here is that the visions of Mother convey as well the idea of an impelling Hour of God concomitant with that young siddhi of her visions to which Dharma Sangha so strangely resembles, a divinely predestined time, which allusions point exactly to here and now.

The overall presence of the Spirit upon the happenings of Mother´s images, her vision of the huge cross, (Christic Consciousness=Maitreya Consciousness) told Mother of a divinely sentenced time and Being, which inspired her the very words:
:Oh yes! I almost work with ardour and energy to hasten the hour....
in relation with the Being whose coming she was announcing.

Anyone who knows about the high attainments of Mother can ask himself how is it that from her spiritual heights she would feel so moved by the figure of the Being she saw.
The idea of the "Times of God" is not mine but is the logical consequence for anybody wishing to personally investigate and interested in the information contained in the "Six Visions".
Even so, I would not say that all related to the Supermental has always to do with great figures, I´m convinced at this very moment  there is quite a number of less known or even totally unknown persons, in which the Supermental is already pushing its way through.
The fact we may not be able to discern the working of the supermental in the actuality do not take necessarily to the conclusion that it is not working at all, and I´m afraid here it would only be a lack of perception on our side.

We should be realistic and consider that even if Dharma Sangha do not expressly or directly talk of the Supermind, yet, what this young man has achieved -thinking that he started his meditation alone in a jungle at about 13th- is at least worth of respect.

I myself am not given to devotional effusions towards human beings, because the commonsense suggests me that the Self I salute in the Guru is the Self in everyone.
But beside of the due respect, even if his teaching do not make any congruent sense to the student of integral yoga, yet it would be at least premature to state that D.S. has not relation at all with the Supermental because indeed, which other sense or direction should we give to it?
After all, the Supermental is not obliged to answer to our expectations about it.

Many times a doctrinal scheme may represent an obstacle on the way of a direct perception, and this is true on both side:
 while the Buddhist-minded people whom knows about D.S. has a tendency to ignore the aim of integral yoga and the message of Mother and Sri Aurobindo,
 the student and practitioner of integral yoga has the opposite tendency, and ignore or undervalue Dharma Sangha.

After all, even the message of Ramalinga Swami was not identical to Sri Aurobindo´s, and today a growing  number of people is convinced his Grace-Light was not different from the Supermental Light.
Whomever and whatever opens in the actuality, they open on the supermental possibilities and not any other, so the link subsists anyway.
 For Mother, the Person in her vision was of transcendental importance, as much as the Time of his appearance, there is no reason why for us  should be less important.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Active Meditation


Active Meditation
When we sit with our eyes closed to silence the mind, we are at first submerged by a torrent of thoughts; they crop up from every side, like frightened or even aggressive rats.
(Satprem, "The Adventure of Consciousness")
http://integral-yoga2.narod.ru/IntegralYoga/Satprem/Adventure_of_Consciousness/Satprem.Adventure_of_Consciousness.eng.htm

Some people was critical with Satprem's flowery language and thought there was something wrong with him, but it was comprehensible when he felt himself to belong to that wave of symbolic and sacrilegious poetry and poets which appeared in France in the last decades of 1800, of which he shared somehow that bohemian kind of life and reasons of existence at least for a season. He was born an adventurer, and so he looked at Consciousness, as an Adventure.

But here in this sentence is not Satprem what we look at but the traditional approach of an european mind and the traditional position. That sentence basically means: sit, meditate, silence, achievement of silence. But when we analyze closer the sentence we see there are possible remarks to be made.
The first and most important: How is it that the very root of the noise may produce silence?
The ego, that we associate to the thinking mind, is that noise. Is it possible that the noise may produce silence out of itself?

Because we may be led to think that if some silence is there, it is because of the operations and stern attitude of the ego, when actually it has nothing to do with the silence, which is -in fact- what is there when the ego is -not there-.

Another point is : that silence is to be reached sitting in meditation, and what happen with the rest of  the day? Is it noise allowed or silence?
And after all what is meditation?

We have to came to the evident conclusion that "ego" and "silence" are -concomitant-, but not interdependent, because noise may not produce silence out of itself.
You understand the point here.
So, the real question to be posed would be: how to set ideal conditions for that silence to manifest itself, to emerge spontaneously, because if it is not spontaneous it will be a manipulation of the ego, an instrumentalization of the silence for our own purpose and not for the purpose of the silence, which may well have a different purpose from our own. Because we want the silence to stop our thoughts, not for  what the silence is in -itself-; we set a series of circumstances which looks negative to us and we want to substitute that with another set of opposed circumstances as bliss, peace, etc., we actually are merchandising silence, we are trying to make a smart business, by selling something we don´t give any value and exchanging it with a new and wonderful set of privileged bliss and spiritual knowledge.

After all, who and why is searching for silence?
An ego tired of himself and its limitations? Who wants silence? Why?
Because it seems an historical or doctrinaire proof that something has been achieved by sitting in meditation?
Is it the great alchemy of the being we are looking for, to which silence seems akeen?
But is this great alchemy something we built, or it expresses itself when the ego is not there?
You understand those are important questions, because we want to learn how to meditate, and basically we do not even know what meditation is.
So to start with: What is meditation?
An action, within that same field of wanting to produce silence.
So it is a movement vitiated from the beginning, because we are -presuming- a result into that direction, the ego is trying to extend its purpose into a next future, you see, it is a farther mental operation, which may exclude any other thing meant to manifest itself.
Because we have linked again meditation with silence. As an indissoluble thing.
But, and if meditation were something larger than this we are expecting, or different, how could we program its manifestation?
Again, is that a -legitimate- movement?
Evidently, to know what meditation is we need attention.
Attention to the process, which is not a process to be established routinely at fixed hours in time, but pretends to involve our whole life at any moment, because we -know- somehow, we feel a certain urgency that a change should be made and that change has to be a whole radical change, that meditation should be something more complete, which breaks with routine and devolve its meaning to life.

So at first sight it seems that meditation should be purposeless, at least not with the purposes of the ego, and it needs to sustain itself on attention, and needs to be an action extended in time, not a clock-directed purpose of spiritual transformation.
But why we want to transform and what?
If meditation sustain itself on attention, then, -attention- is here the most important element, sitting in meditation would be of subordinate value. We sit in meditation so to produce attention.
But is attention produced by the mind or the ego?
Or rather is a condition of being, as much the noise or the silence are?
So, what is attention?
It is evidently not a purpose.
If I concentrate on what I'm reading, the mind and my breath becomes still, but attention do not belong to that mind, it is something beyond it.

The attachment to results in meditation may become one more of the attachments we pretend to free ourselves!
Instead is important to understand the process of attention, which is all what is meant to achieve sitting in asanas, or in many other different ways man has discovered since its appearance.
When we give attention to the whole process, we certainly see the breath and the attention are related.
And we see that a deeper attention needs almost a suspension of the breath, and we know that a few deep breaths concentrate the mind as we often see athletes in television before their performance.
So we -know-, we spontaneously know the relation with breath and being, meditation takes out that spontaneous knowledge we -already- have, or rather -are-.
But it may be an error to  think that -only- sitting in meditation that can be achieved.
In this sense, the whole Nature truly meditate, birds and animals and trees and flowers, but only the human doesn't...
It is because they, the animals, are what they are, with attention.
They do not pretend being something else, but express their true nature.
Without complication of any kind, just plain and simply that.
So may be we should ask ourself if meditation asks to reflect that original condition as a previous movement, if the base of meditation is just -being oneself-.